![]() Development of Windows Vista - Wikipedia. Development of Windows Vista occurred over the span of five and a half years, starting in earnest in May 2. Vista's original codename, . Many of Microsoft's developers were also re- tasked with improving the security of Windows XP. Faced with ongoing delays and concerns about feature creep, Microsoft announced on August 2. Some previously announced features, such as Win. ![]() FS and NGSCB, were dropped or postponed. After . Between September 2. October 2. 00. 6, Microsoft released regular Community Technology Previews (CTP) to beta testers, and two release candidates to the general public. Development of Windows Vista came to a conclusion with the November 8, 2. Windows development, Jim Allchin. Early development. During this period, Microsoft was fairly quiet about what was being worked on, as their marketing and public relations focus was more strongly focused on Windows XP, and Windows Server 2. April 2. 00. 3. Occasional builds of Longhorn were leaked onto popular file sharing networks such as IRC, Bit. Torrent, e. Donkey and various newsgroups, and so most of what is known about builds prior to the first sanctioned development release of Longhorn in May 2. Most builds of Longhorn and Vista were identified by a label that was always displayed in the bottom- right corner of the desktop. A typical build label would look like . Higher build numbers didn't automatically mean that the latest features from every development team at Microsoft was included. Typically, a team working on a certain feature or subsystem would generate their own working builds which developers would test with, and when the code was deemed stable, all the changes would be incorporated back into the main development tree at once. Forgot Windows Password? Reset All Windows 7, XP, Vista Password for Free! Download RocketDock Skin to Get Windows 8 Charms Bar in Windows XP, Vista, 7. UPDATE: Article updated with new information. Charms Bar resources have been updated to. Free Scan for Windows ® 10, 8, 7, Vista & XP Operating Systems. Charges apply for license with premium features. See registration process for full details. You can even install Windows Vista with USB 2.0 flash memory drive now. All you need is a high speed 4GB flash memory only to create a bootable Windows Vista on flash. Best Digital Photo Software For Editing And Sharing Images Best Security Software for Windows and Mac Your backup plan: Best backup apps for Windows. At Microsoft, a number of . The lab in which any given build originated is shown as part of the build label, and the date and time of the build follows that. Disk Image software - Active@ Disk Image can do a backup as well as clone the full hard drive. A backup image may be stored on a USB drive, network storage, burned. Development of Windows Vista occurred over the span of five and a half years, starting in earnest in May 2001, prior to the release of Microsoft's Windows XP. Some builds (such as Beta 1 and Beta 2) only display the build label in the version information dialog (Winver), and the icons are from Windows XP. Milestone 2. It was the first sighting of the . This feature later appeared in Windows 7. Windows Vista Ultimate: Intro: If you want all of the best business features, all of the best mobility features, and all of the best home entertainment features that. How to Choose Between Windows XP and Windows Vista. Windows XP and Windows Vista are not the same. How and why is this? It is not just the date, or the new style of. Milestone 3. This build was the first of several that had a working title of . Visually it was not significantly different from Windows XP. One of the notable changes was that the Windows logo was only white, not colored like all the versions of Windows before it. Also the templates in the My Documents and My Pictures were notably different as well as the Open and Save as dialog boxes also included the template, incorporating aesthetic changes and a few new user interface options. An option in this version of the sidebar also made it possible to move the Start button into it, and disable the traditional taskbar entirely. An early revision of Win. FS was also included, but very little in the way of a user interface was included, and as such it appeared to early testers to be nothing more than a service that consumed large amounts of memory and processor time. It was one of the first builds to include the Desktop Composition Engine (DCE), which later became the Desktop Window Manager (DWM). This build appeared on the Internet long after other builds from this time period, and included several of the changes that were first reported as being part of later milestone builds, including Internet Explorer 6. It included the DCE and some early hardware- accelerated alpha transparency and transition effects. As a demonstration of the DCE's capabilities, programs literally flipped into the taskbar and twisted as they were minimized. Also, when you first install this Build, you will get the Windows Longhorn setup with music from Windows XP. This is the only build that has this. New technology. As an evolutionary release over build 3. An optional . The incorporation of the Plex theme made blue the dominant color of the entire application. The Windows XP- style task pane was almost completely replaced with a large horizontal pane that appeared under the toolbars. ![]() A new search interface allowed for filtering of results, searching of Windows help, and natural- language queries that would be used to integrate with Win. FS. The animated search characters were also removed. File metadata was also made more visible and more easily editable, with more active encouragement to fill out missing pieces of information. Also of note was the conversion of Windows Explorer to being a . NET application. Milestone 5. A number of features Microsoft had been working on were rolled into this build, such as a range of parental controls, also moved and enlarged the Windows logo to the left side of the Start button a lot of additional configurability for the sidebar (including being able to put it below the start bar at the bottom of the screen), and the notion of . These libraries collected content from around the hard drive. The user could then filter this content and save it in a folder. Microsoft had originally intended to replace all special shell folders (My Documents, My Music, etc.) with virtual folders. However, this change was deemed too drastic and was dropped after Beta 1's release in mid- 2. Libraries were later included in Windows 7. This build was also notable for the debut of the boot screen progress bar that is seen in the final release (though 4. A new Download Manager shell location suggested that Internet Explorer would get a Mozilla- style download manager, though no such functionality was apparent. Significant memory leak problems with Windows Explorer and the Sidebar made this build difficult to use, which resulted in some third- party hacks to mitigate the problem. The back- end database of Outlook Express changed completely, and became dependent on Win. FS to store its email. Win. FS itself still had significant performance and memory usage issues, and so it became common for testers to disable Win. FS entirely, thus rendering Outlook Express inoperative. At the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (Win. HEC) conference in May 2. Microsoft gave their first public demonstrations of the new Desktop Window Manager and Aero. The demonstrations were done on a revised build 4. A number of sessions for developers and hardware engineers at the conference focused on these new features, as well as the Next- Generation Secure Computing Base (previously known as . Also at this conference, Microsoft reiterated their roadmap for delivering Longhorn, pointing to an . Traditional client bits, such as visual style and look, were present but disabled by default. Build 4. 02. 9 (build date of June 1. September 2. 3, 2. This build contained few of the technologies new to build 4. Windows Explorer went through a number of other changes. Larger image and video previews were displayed in a tooltip when the mouse hovered over a file, column- level filtering of results was introduced, and overall performance of Explorer was somewhat improved over build 4. There was also a new analog clock user interface. Batch image processing of images was also introduced, making it possible for a user to rotate a number of images at once. Build 4. 02. 9's name was displayed as . While some had presumed that screenshots of this build were fake because of this seemingly obvious mistake, Microsoft later explained that this was merely a test of some new code to locate and reduce the number of places in the operating system code that the name was defined. This build includes Phodeo, a 3. D view of displaying photos, and full DWM and glass. This was the last build to contain the Plex visual style. Milestone 7. However, the Aero glass from Build 4. It introduced the Slate theme, which debuted in 4. Lab. 06. This build also contained an updated version of Internet Explorer with a version number of 6. New features noted by reviewers included a Download Manager, pop- up blocker, add- on manager and a tool to clear browsing history. When Windows Sidebar was enabled, the word . Although this build identified itself as a . An updated version of Phodeo was included, as well as the Sidebar, a Mini- Windows Media Player and associated sidebar tiles, a functioning build of the Desktop Window Manager and the Jade theme. This build also replaced many XP icons with new Longhorn icons, some of which greatly resemble icons in the final version of Vista. This build was leaked on December 2. The technology, better known by its original code- name of . Ross Anderson, for example, published a paper, collating many of these concerns and criticisms as part of a larger analysis on Trusted Computing. Leaked in May 2. 00. This build introduced an improved Jade theme, although the Slate theme was retained and was the default. Also, the font Segoe UI was introduced for the Jade theme. Build 4. 08. 3 (build date of May 1. Leaked on November 1. Both Sidebar and Win. FS were dropped from this release. Considered highly unstable, including the absence of programs in the start menu and driver and installation issues. Build 4. 09. 3 (build date of August 1. It was one of the last builds compiled before the development reset. Considered highly unstable, it contained Sidebar, Win. FS, and an Avalon- based Windows Movie Maker, a preliminary version of Windows Anytime Upgrade, and the Microsoft Annaspeech synthesizer. There was an Avalon- based Display Properties control panel applet hidden in the \WINDOWS\SYSTEM3. Build 3. 68. 3. Mid- 2. Mid- 2. 00. 5: Development . Internally, some Microsoft employees were describing the Longhorn project as . It offered only a limited subset of features planned for Longhorn, in particular fast file searching and integrated graphics and sound processing, but appeared to have impressive reliability and performance compared to contemporary Longhorn builds. In December 2. 00. Allchin enlisted the help of two other senior executives, Brian Valentine and Amitabh Srivastava, the former being experienced with shipping software at Microsoft, most notably Windows Server 2. Macs are still better than Windows PCs. A journalist colleague of mine recently put this question out there: “I’m sure I’ll either get ignored or flamed for this but what’s with all the pro- Mac stuff at the moment? It seems as though everyone ? I use it every day and I admit I don’t like it much either but I don’t think it’s that bad that I’d jump to using or recommending a Mac instead. Perhaps it’s because of the tiresome arguments from people like this. So here’s my answer. Note despite what I said above about the argument really being between operating systems these days I’ve looked at Macs as a hardware and software combination in this article pitted against regular PCs running Windows. Do you agree/disagree with the points here? Tell me why — but make sure your points are solidly argued and make sure you read the whole article before flaming me. There’s an important bit right at the very bottom. Reliable sleep mode. The killer feature of every Mac which can’t be underestimated (and you don’t realise how important it is until you own a Mac) is OS X’s 1. Windows PCs have just never had this. Reliability on Windows is hit and miss and it’s nowhere near instant. As a result most people are in the habit of shutting down their PC totally — or worse leaving them on 2. The difference between Mac and Windows in this respect is the difference between broadband and dialup internet. Back in the 9. 0s many people couldn’t see the point of paying extra for an always- on internet service as “it only takes a minute to connect using the dialup. Boot time shouldn’t be such a pivotal issue if suspend and resume worked well. Mac users probably reboot their Mac on average about once a month — and often only to install an OS update. Which leads to my second point. Extremely fast boot times. Rebooting a Windows PC can be such a painful experience that you really procrastinate doing it. Unless you’re running on the highest spec hardware Vista can take minutes to start up. Mac OS X starts up from a cold boot in about 2. Mac. Book Pro. As another journalist contributing to the discussion observed this is not a faked boot speed where the operating system maker has rushed to get the login window on screen but delayed loading the rest of the OS. It’s a genuine boot- to- usable- desktop time. Apple uses good quality parts. Aside from the operating system Mac hardware is usually good quality. Apple’s fit and finish doesn’t generally bend and creak like the plastic panels on many PC laptops; Apple’s keyboards are high quality; Apple selects good quality parts like very good LCD panels for its screens. You can essentially buy a Mac product sight- unseen and know you’ll be happy with the quality of the display whereas PC laptops are a huge grab bag ranging from horrendous dim rubbish to spectacular. Less blinking lights. Apple doesn’t festoon its hardware with blinking lights and inconveniently placed wireless on/off buttons headphone jacks etc. PC manufacturers are starting to understand this and are producing increasingly clean designs (The HP 2. PC notebooks. When I’m using my laptop in a dark room at night I don’t want five bright purple and orange status lights blinking away at me. And when I’m using the laptop propped up on my legs on the sofa I don’t want to be constantly accidentally turning off the Wi. Fi. I don’t want the headphone jack mounted on the front of the notebook because when I plug the headphones in the jack will be bumping in to my body if I’ve got the notebook propped up on my knees lying on the sofa. This lack of basic design refinement can make PC notebooks annoying to use for the entire lifespan of the unit (and it’s not always something you can . OS X + Windows is better than just Windows. Ignoring Linux for a second on a Mac I can legitimately run OS X and Windows (natively or under virtualisation). On a PC I can only legitimately run Windows. It means I can use OS X for everything but if there’s the occasional application for Windows I need to use (specialised company application; MS Access; mobile phone firmware upgrader utilities) I can easily do use Windows. Another of my colleagues said she’s found a good use for OS X’s Spaces virtual desktop feature — OS X on one desktop and Windows on another desktop. Of course you can always pause a virtual machine too which means having Windows on- call when you need it doesn’t need to be chewing up CPU time in the background. Easier to troubleshoot Macs. It’s usually pretty easy to figure out what’s going wrong with a Mac. There are three applications that help you and are all in one place and easy to find in the Applications/Utilities folder: It’s very rare that you can’t get a decent hint of where a system problem lies from those three apps. On Windows similar apps are available in the system but they’re more scattered and immeasurably more difficult for the average user to find. A culture of good quality community software. There’s a culture of very good quality freeware/shareware with excellent user interfaces on Mac — probably a result of Apple leading by example in user- interface design and shareware authors emulating this. The average Mac user could get away with only purchasing Microsoft Office and using freeware/shareware and Apple provided software for everything else. On Windows the signal to noise ratio in freeware/shareware is extremely high. There’s so much junk software out there; it can be hard to find a tool that’s good quality. Some examples of exceptionally good shareware which I don’t think there’s an equivalently good Windows alternative for (taking into account both the software capabilities - and- the front- end GUI): 8. More useful apps out of the box. Every Mac comes with some very useful apps that don’t come on Windows. But remember the majority of computer users are not power users. Neat and contained system settings. Apple is very neat with its OS config settings. In Windows there’s many many places you can change system- wide settings — the registry add/remove programs the hardware manager the services manager network connections control panel etc. On a Mac the OS config settings are basically all in the control panel (with a few exceptions — notably the default browser can only be changed through Apple’s own Safari browser — evil.)It makes both using a Mac and supporting other people using Macs much easier. One specific example: it is overcomplicated to guide a user to editing the TCP/IP settings for a particular network adaptor on Windows but it’s one of the most common things you have to do to resolve network issues. But accessing network adaptors is a cinch on Mac OS X. Apple doesn’t load the system up with crap. Oh sure Apple festoons its OS with hooks into online services designed to get you to spend money. But on the whole Apple’s festooning with vendor- specific services is much less intrusive than on Windows.- image- Just about every (brand name) PC sold comes loaded up with junk that keeps popping up at you reminding you your six month trial is about to run out and some apps are deliberately difficult to uninstall. Macs come with i. Photo (linked to with Apple’s book/photo printing service) Mobile. Me (stays out of your way unless you specifically activate it) i. Tunes (to purchase stuff through the i. Tunes store) and so on. Basically Apple doesn’t try to force its way into your wallet like PCs tend to — Apple takes a carrot approach with some genuinely useful services rather than a stick (“your PC is our advertising billboard cough up buddy”). Of course this isn’t a problem with Windows itself per se but it is inextricably married to the Windows user experience for most people. Tonnes of small reasons make Mac OS X better. There are a large number of very small reasons a Mac is great to work on: every version of OS X has sophisticated screenshot capability built in. CMD+4 provides a selector marquee. CMD+4+Spacebar takes just one window. CMD+3 takes the whole screen. You can set the format of the screenshot file and where Mac OS saves it. The inbuilt image viewing app is powerful — it can view PDF and open/export to most other image formats; you can crop resize rotate adjust colour balance etc. Expose lets you quickly see all your open windows or your desktop or just the windows of your current app. Way better than ALT+Tab (which Macs also have) or Flip 3. D (which Macs thankfully don’t have.)The Dock is much more efficient to use than the Windows start menu and taskbar — the icon opens an app or returns to it if it’s already open. It doesn’t become crowded when you have lots of windows open. Target disk mode allows you to boot a Mac into a mode where the whole machine acts like an external hard drive. Plug it to another Mac using Firewire and you have the easiest way in the world to do a system- to- system drive mirror. Windows simply doesn’t have this. Still no need for additional security software. On a Mac you don’t have to run additional security software which therefore doesn’t slow down the computer doesn’t cause problems and you don’t have to shell out for an annual subscription for it. This is an enormously contentious point. Some people will argue black and blue that you need to be a good citizen in the world and make sure you’re scanning for Windows viruses on your Mac email in case you accidentally forward on a virus sent from one Windows user to you to another Windows user. My opinion is: if Fords have a problem with their wheels falling off that’s never going to be resolved I’m not going to drive my Holden slowly on every road just because a Ford might find its wheels falling off at any time. And what’s with Microsoft selling One. Care anti- virus? It has decided to make money off selling a fix to a problem in its original product (Windows). That’s just offensive. Apple seems largely to be lameness free. On the whole Apple seems to come up with far fewer lame ideas that were non- starters to begin with. Microsoft on the other hand is the master of lame ideas. For example Sideshow in Vista.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |